Skip Navigation

Philosophia Mathematica 2005 13(2):187-193; doi:10.1093/philmat/nki025
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Potter, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Philosophia Mathematica (III), Vol. 13 No. 2 © Oxford University Press, 2005, all rights reserved

What Is Wrong with Abstraction?{dagger}

Michael Potter* and Peter Sullivan**

*Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge, CB3 0DG, and Department of Philosophy, University of Stirling Stirling, FK9 4LA, United Kingdom
**Department of Philosophy, University of Stirling Stirling, FK9 4LA, United Kingdom

We correct a misunderstanding by Hale and Wright of an objection we raised earlier to their abstractionist programme for rehabilitating logicism in the foundations of mathematics.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Philosophia MathematicaHome page
B. Hale and C. Wright
Abstraction and Additional Nature
Philosophia Mathematica, June 1, 2008; 16(2): 182 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.