A Nominalist's Dilemma and its Solution
*Department of Philosophy, University of South Carolina Columbia, S. C. 29208 U. S. A. obueno{at}sc.edu
**Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University Stanford, California 94305 U. S. A. zalta{at}stanford.edu
Current versions of nominalism in the philosophy of mathematics have the benefit of avoiding commitment to the existence of mathematical objects. But this comes with the cost of not taking mathematical theories literally. Jody Azzouni's Deflating Existential Consequence has recently challenged this conclusion by formulating a nominalist view that lacks this cost. In this paper, we argue that, as it stands, Azzouni's proposal does not yet succeed. It faces a dilemma to the effect that either the view is not nominalist or it fails to take mathematics literally. After presenting the dilemma, we suggest a possible solution for the nominalist.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Azzouni Empty de re Attitudes About Numbers Philosophia Mathematica, September 22, 2008; (2008) nkn025v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
